- Home
- The...
The Supreme Court finally found a limit to the Second Amendment
The Supreme Court on Friday upheld a federal law barring individuals subject to domestic violence restraining orders from possessing guns. In doing so, eight justices sent an important message: The Second Amendment’s right to bear arms is not entirely unlimited, and there are situations where the government can restrict gun possession. This may come as a surprise to many who have watched the conservative-dominated court bolster gun rights over the years — but in reality it is an attempt to keep the lower courts in check after a series of vague and harmful rulings.
The case in question involved a man named Zackey Rahimi. The record indicates that in 2019, Rahimi grabbed his girlfriend, who is the mother of his child, and “dragged her back to his car, and shoved her in, causing her to strike her head against the dashboard.” After his girlfriend attempted to escape, Rahimi fired shots, which may have been aimed at his girlfriend or the person who witnessed the initial assault. Rahimi’s girlfriend came forward and requested a temporary restraining order against him, which a state court judge granted.
Undeterred, Rahimi violated that order, in part by approaching his girlfriend’s home at night. In addition, police officers “identified him as the suspect in a spate of at least five additional shootings,” according to the opinion. In one example, after a restaurant declined Rahimi’s friend’s credit card, apparently “Rahimi pulled a gun and shot into the air.” Ultimately, “Rahimi was indicted on one count of possessing a firearm while subject to a domestic violence restraining order,” in violation of federal law.
How, one might ask, is there any question as to whether someone like Rahimi could be barred from possessing guns, even temporarily? The answer is that over the last 16 years, the court made two big conclusions about the Second Amendment that have created a high, high constitutional bar for imposing gun control measures.
First, in 2008, a deeply divided Supreme Court concluded that the Second Amendment’s right to bear arms applies not just to the military, or militias as the amendment’s wording states. Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for a five-person majority in District of Columbia v. Heller, identified for the first time an “individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation.” If you want to talk about legal earthquakes, this was one, creating a constitutional right possessed by all individuals to bear arms for self-defense. In practice, this means that if the government wants to tread on that right, it needs a compelling reason to do so.
The Heller opinion did recognize that this newly discovered right can be limited. Scalia specifically wrote that “nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.” But lower courts have been struggling ever since to determine when this individual right to bear arms can be limited.
Fast-forward to 2022, when the Supreme Court weighed in on New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. Bruen. In the 6-3 opinion, the court struck down a New York law that required people who wanted to obtain a concealed carry permit to “demonstrate a special need for self-protection distinguishable from that of the general community.” In doing so, Justice Clarence Thomas created a new test that dictates that gun regulations at the state and federal level alike can only be upheld if they are “consistent with the Second Amendment’s text and historical understanding.” This is, to be clear, a more difficult standard to satisfy than the one lower courts were using prior to 2022.
The Bruen ruling’s new standard allowed lower court judges to erroneously rely on it to strike down the federal law at issue in the Rahimi case. Specifically, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last year concluded that Congress had “failed to demonstrate” that the Domestic Violence Offender Gun Ban, which passed in 1996, “fits within our Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.” Friday’s ruling in Rahimi overturned that decision, letting the law stand and remanding the case back to the lower court.
The opinion from Chief Justice John Roberts represents an important clarification of the new standards the court has created over the last 16 years. The court’s conclusion that “when an individual poses a clear threat of physical violence to another, the threatening individual may be disarmed” should be uncontroversial. It is in effect a relatively narrow shift, focused as it is on whether people like Rahimi — who throw their girlfriends against dashboards and fire shots at restaurant workers who decline credit cards — can temporarily lose their right to possess guns under the court’s recent decisions. It remains difficult for governments to limit gun ownership and possession — but Friday’s decision affirms that “difficult” is not the same as “impossible.”
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
- https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/the-supreme-court-finally-found-a-limit-to-the-second-amendment/ar-BB1oGRVX?ocid=00000000
Related
A North Korean Missile Explodes in the Sky—and a Mystery Emerges
Pyongyang and Seoul have given opposing appraisals of whether Kim Jong Un had achieved a prized advance in weapons technology.
NewsMcConnell breaks with Trump on vilification of Biden
Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) says Joe Biden is a “good guy,” breaking with former President Trump’s repeated efforts to villainize the president as the corrupt mastermind behind schemes to steal elections and persecute political opponents. But McConnell, who has endorsed Trump, says there are plenty of compelling policy reasons to oust Biden from…
NewsRussian Satellite Explodes, Forcing Space Station Astronauts into Cover for Nearly an Hour
American space agencies have reported that an obsolete Russian satellite broke up near the International Space Station, forcing the incumbent astronauts into cover for almost an hour. Knewz.com has learned that the Roscosmos craft broke into more than 100 pieces—all of which were large enough to be tracked from Earth. NASA’s International Space Sta...
NewsUnknown Human Lineage Found Buried in The Neanderthal Genome
As Homo sapiens migrated into Eurasia more than 70,000 years ago, much of the continent was already inhabited by Neanderthals, hominins who shared an ancestor with us but had spent roughly half a million years diverging. We don't know much about their ensuing relationship, but it was probably contentious at times. While Neanderthals eventually disappeared 40,000 years ago, there are now 8 billion of us. During their Late Pleistocene overlap in...
NewsSA president hits out at coalition partner in fierce row
South Africa's coalition partners are at loggerheads just weeks after agreeing to share power.
NewsAnother 400,000 people left Germany's Catholic Church last year, but the pace slowed from 2022
BERLIN (AP) — Another 400,000 people formally left the Catholic Church in Germany last year, though the number was down from a record set in 2022 as church leaders struggle to put a long-running scandal over abuse by clergy behind them and tackle calls for reform, official figures showed Thursday. The German Bishops' Conference said that 402,694 people left the church in 2023. That was down from 522,821 the previous year, but still the...
NewsWhat to do when your own number appears to ring your home phone
What happens when your landline rings and the caller ID lists your number? Strange, right? This happened to one of our subscribers, who reached out to ask us about it.
NewsHistoric stones restored to original position
The stones, part of a double stone row on Dartmoor, gives visitors "a glimpse into the past".
News